I had, in a previous article, suggested that the methods of mind control used in India may be are of Soviet origin. I still believe in the theory. For one thing, the Soviets were the first in developing the technology and for another the Indian governments as well as certain political parties were in intimate touch with them during the existence of the Soviet Union.
From a perusal of the literature on Soviet methods of brainwashing and psychotronics available on the net it is apparent that these were not of the polished kind. They used hard and tough tactics( both overtly and covertly) to break a person down. It can be called the bulldozer technique of mind control. It lacks the finesse (only comparatively my friends, please do not me wrongly) of the more talked about American electronic mind control methods. Perhaps it was because of the active involvement of the state in this, in both Soviet Union and East Germany, that cruder methods were adopted. This can not be the case with the so called “democratic” countries. The media may cause trouble. (See why some folks dislike democracy intensely?!)
But there are people who would rather believe in the devil than in the existence of the electronic weapons of mind control. The subject is well documented on the net, though mostly about the researches done in America. Anyhow I won’t go into it at any detail here. What interests me really is the Soviet or the present Russian progress in the field. These are not readily accessible since the iron curtain had effectively concealed their earlier researches into the field and even in these times you need to know Russian to do a bit of research. There is very little about Soviet development in these areas in print.
But Eleanor White and Cheryl Welsh have published some articles containing translated Russian pages in C.A.H.R.A. Home Page. (C,A.H.R.A. has now become http://mindjustice.org/. ) From these, it appears that legislations on the subject were presented in Duma the Russian parliament. As per the C.A.H.R.A. article the authors V. Lopatin and V. Cygankov suggested a bill on the above lines in their book “Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia”- (Publishing house : SINTEG, Moscow, Russian Federation1999.)
What caught my interest was the part stating the “fundamental principles” in the book quoted by them. Here is a portion from it.
“Fundamental principles
1) To admit THE EXISTENCE OF PSI PHENOMENA AS A
REAL FACT as well as their not only at place, local influence
and importance, but as well the global noospherical influence
on all the mankind.
2) To admit the REAL FEASIBILITY of informational,
PSYCHOTRONIC war (as a matter of fact it is already
taking place without declaration of war, secretly) and the
FEASIBILITY of the use of violence by
means of THE USE of PSW.
7) DECLASSIFICATION of all the works on PSI problem.
The arms race is speeding up as a consequence of classification.
Secrecy - this is in the first place the way to secure cruel control
over the people. the way how to curtail their creativity, turn
them into biorobots.”
In the above sentences, PSW means Psychotronic weapons. Several parliamentary hearings on the subject are mentioned in the book by the authors. It may be hard for even the present Russian government to admit that such things exist in their hands. So the hearings may not have progressed any further at all. This could be the case as could be seen from the following.
Eleanor White says in the article that she does not know whether legislations mentioned in the book were put to vote or not. I tried to look up the Duma legislations on the subject as suggested by her in that article but was unable to locate anything. All the same the information contained in the article is valuable. It more or less admits that Russia has such weapons in hand and that they are being used on people. This book, published in Russian, can not be influenced by anything other than the situation existing in their country.
The fear of being turned into biorobots as mentioned in the above quote is very real now. What we see in these isolated instances is the tip of the iceberg. It may still be much worse than we imagine it to be. I certainly would have liked to have seen both the book and the copies of any legislation on the subject in Russia.
There are reports of electronic harassment in China too. May be they are taking a leaf out of the Russian book or may be unknown to the general public the technology has existed in most technologically developed/developing nations in the world for a long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment