Hunting tools

Well, when the heat of the situation really begins to get to the seat of your pants you sit up and take notice what is happening around you. Suddenly scales fall from your eyes and you are clear sighted. Your brain begins to pick up speed and show you things that you were hitherto not aware of.
You poor TI’s, you always knew that there were weapons like the ADS, the Active Denial System. But there was already an “active denial system” otherwise, that which actively denied the existence of such weapons. The potency of this machine was and is still so great that among a hundred bipeds( those we call the humans) ninety nine would remain in a state of blissful apathy towards what is happening in their midst. “Man, the trouble of it all!” Anyway what in the god’s name are they talking about, controlling minds, dude, did you hear the like? Like we are dumb, mind you, I been to Harvard (Oxford, Sorbonne, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research) and ****ing boring too. Slogging like dummies. Who discovered the bloody world anyway?
It may be well to be complacent at least for the time being, at least till you are ravished mentally. Yeah I know the word has erotic connotations. And who says there aren’t such things in mind control. The popular terminology itself describes it thus. They are mentally doing it to you and you are sadly acknowledging the fact. For you belong to the minority that is facing the punishment but chastisement for what? None seems to know really.
But some seems to sense that it is happening. Dr. Kingsly Dennis is one. He is dry and he is non committal, but he is bothered. He is currently examining “physical–digital convergences and how these might impact upon social processes” and he is concerned “with the digital rendition of identity and the implications of surveillance technologies.”Hmmm. He surely belongs to the one percent of bipeds with something we call sensibility. And mighty scarce that is too.
He has written a paper on” New Instruments of Surveillance and Social Control: Wireless Technologies which Target the Neuronal Functioning of the Brain” Most of the things he points out to us are already well documented. May be he would do well to visit some mind control sites to learn more about the psycho-somatic impacts of invasive electronic technology which are currently in use. But this does not rob him of sincerity with which he has approached the problem. It may prove heavy reading and some what like regurgitation to some of you but nevertheless the paper is a fine one. It has also some information of interest. Like the bit about Microsoft’s patent on “‘Method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body”
Here is an excerpt from his paper:
“In this patent Microsoft is granted exclusive rights to a technology that uses the electrical capacity of the human body to act as a computer network (Adam, 2004). Microsoft envisages ‘using the human skin’s conductive properties to link a host of electronic devices around the body, from pagers and personal data assistants (PDA) to mobile phones and microphones, although the company is uncharacteristically coy about exactly what it may have in mind’ (Adam, 2004). This supports what Bill Gates himself has said about the computer finally disappearing into the environment and the world around us (Gibson, 2005). This may be the ultimate wireless network, using the complete skin of the body, from fingers to toes, receiving and transmitting flows of information. The patent also proposes that an area of skin could even act as a keypad making a person capable of typing by tapping on their arm (Adam, 2004).”
Bill Gates himself has incidentally disappeared from Microsoft to surface in social work it seems. All the same the technology looks promising. If the heat in our bodies could be harnessed and used to charge and connect electronic gadgets it could be handy in saving power. But the other aspect is a bit worrying. To use the skins conductivity to link electronic devises around the body might prove disastrous to the carriers in more than one manner. There are already techniques to zap us of our energy and drain us out. It is a sort of Vampirism. There are said to be emotional vampires and energy vampires amongst us. This technology might make them more efficient. And another thing is every supposedly user friendly technology Microsoft had ever produced has had some catch in it. Their operating systems are always known to have mind control capabilities... The new invention would not be any better.
His reference to Panopticon (Jeremy Bentham’s plan of a prison where the guards can monitor prisoners without being seen) and Surveillance are also note worthy. In a society where the individual is threatened with all sorts of surveillance tools and designs, people have no other choice but to record the events of their life for either personal reference or to make others aware that this is being done to them. This is called inverse surveillance. This has an interesting beginning. In buildings fitted with all sorts of surveillance equipment, the guards usually behave strangely when they come in contact with a person entering the premises with some sort of monitoring devises which would give the secret away. This often led to conflicts and confrontations between the public and the guards.
This reaction of the guards may have something to do with the covert and illegal nature of the surveillance their firm is doing on public. What they are taught from childhood about other people’s rights might be causing internal conflicts on the poor sentries standing at their post. They are sub consciously aware that what is being done is wrong. At the same time they have an obligation towards their employers who are paying them. This creates conflicts. This can be exploited by conscious use of inverse surveillance tools.
There are several other interesting observations in the paper too. For example in the future “computers — pervasive and non–perceptible — will be seeded and woven throughout the environment. They will be painted onto walls, on furniture and objects, inside the body, ‘communicating with one another constantly and requiring no more power than that which they can glean from radio frequencies in the air’ (Schwartz, et al., 2006). Quantum researcher and physicist Stuart Wolf anticipates that the next two decades will usher in a type of communications he calls ‘network–enabled telepathy’. Despite the fanciful name the method basically involves wearable devices (such as a ‘quantum headband’) sharing identity and downloaded information with others in the person’s social network; and all driven by the power of thought alone. However, as Wolf points out, ‘it will probably take a new generation raised to think of quantum headbands as normal for its potential to be truly realized’ (Schwartz, et al., 2006). Yet Wolf isn’t alone in his thinking.”
This is not mere science fiction. At the rate of the development of technology these wonders may be in our lives even before we know it. The author says that the major technology in the future could be neurotechnology (we saw it coming didn’t we) .In conclusion he has this to say:
“Becoming wireless also means becoming increasingly immersed within an information–saturated environment. From the evidence of present trends and developments it seems likely that a greater systemic interconnectedness and interdependence is being formed between human–object–environment facilitated through and by information flows. This may herald the coming of a ‘wonderful wireless world’, yet it may also signal unforeseen dangers in protection, privacy, and security of the human biological body within these new relationships. It is the suggestion of this paper that such issues and concerns need to become more public, visible, and open; the very opposite of these technologies.”
I couldn’t agree more. But the doubt is would it be allowed. The structure of authority in the world is such that their basic concept of ruling is to terrorize public. It is a submissive society that they want. There are reports that the US, Canada, Britain, France and China (would you believe it!) are part of a global surveillance alliance. It has always been my belief that the governments the world over have started to view their public as their biggest enemy. An informed and reacting public is the last thing they want. They would prevent it from happening.
Dr. Kingsly Dennis is concerned and illuminative. Read his article at the following link:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8263